What is dramatically effective about Act 3, Scene 1 of Shakespears "Romeo and Juliet"

By the end of act 3, scene 1 two important characters are dead and an another(prenominal) banished, exempting them from most of the remaining lineament of the play. Act 3, scene 1 is a pivotal betoken in the play where the plot takes a turn for misfortune and tragedy.

In itself this scene is bound to be dramatically effective because of the sham it has on the storyline of the play and it does not transcend straightaway, fury and revenge play a large part of Tybalts lust for a passage of arms; but, how is the effect of the involvement that eventually does happen strengthened even further onstage?

Act 3, scene 1 is, for the most part, a armed combat scene. On its own fighting is a dramatic device but Shakespeare put other effects into place as well when he was piece of writing this scene but the fighting is my first point. Why? flake is actually a dramatic effect, this is because when there is a fight the audience do not know the outcome, creating an ore of tension, to them its a Waz Goanna go through scenario.

Another dramatically effective part of this scene is when Romeo originally refuses Tybalts contest but after Mercutios ending he is eager for the fight; Either thou, or I, or both, must go with him.



I remember that this is also important because the audience feel that Mercutios ace of honour has now affected Romeo as well. Does he necessity revenge or does he just feel that Mercutio would cast off? Almost as if he has been spurred into action by his friends death and not by the whole idea of family honour that is pump point in the play although maybe its a combination.

I think that it is worth saying that there was (for indirect request of a better...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper