Travel Writing: Romantics to Newspaper :: Analysis Literature Traveling Essays Papers

Travel Writing Romantics to Newspaper After see various works from Romantic travel authors such as Gilpin, Wordsworth, Goethe and others, I was interested in how their writings conventions have changed when a different median(a) is used. each Saturday the local newspaper, The Edmonton Journal, has a section that is strictly dedicated to travel destinations and topics pertaining to travel. appropriately named Travel, this section describes exotic locations for tourist and travelers. Its articles contrast the Romantics exposition of the environment by having less emphasis on the picturesque and sublime, more think on historical background, and greater detail in the lives of people living there. I believe that these differences are credited largely to one factor the writings medium influences what is being stressed as the purpose of the generator is different. Travel articles focus largely on describing nature only in terms of staple fibre description. When referencing a scene with specific characteristics (such as cliffs, waterfalls or mountains) the Romantic writer describes the scene as if the reader has very little experience or expectation for what the scene should look like. The result is often elaborate description after elaborate description. Newspaper travel sections do not business concern themselves with such sensory description near the same extent for a number of reasons. The newspaper focuses less on creating imagery for the reader because of the affix in availability to travel, images of the picturesque and sublime on television and movies, and the charge of photographs physically next to the text. 1. Nearly every article, within this section, is accompanied by a large photograph showing the prop upscape. By presenting the writers description of the land next to the photograph, the article intrinsically promotes a comparison by the reader, tell the colourful photograph with the writers course. If the photograph presents a landscape di fferent from the magnificent description of the travel writer (which inevitably happens with readers mental constructs) the reader forget find it hard to trust the writer in the accuracy of description. The writer wisely follows the saying that a picture says a thousand words and is better off letting the picture do the talking. After all, the diary keeper has less space and more constrictions than the novelist does. 2. The dominant concern for the travel diarist is conveying what they want in a limited space. The journalist does not have space to elaborately describe every cliff, river or valley. It is, therefore, up to the writer to assume that, with the addition of the given photographs, the reader would be competent to visualize a serene waterfall or placid lake.