Executive ad legislative department Essay

In the Philippines the executive surgical incision is the most essential core of the government. Governance is achievable even without gathering or legislature but ruling with no executive is high-priced impossible. The executive is headed by a president, it is a de get downment of government aerated with the administration or implementation of a policy or law. In presidential system it is viewed as a wateryling form of government in at least some Latin American countries akin Costa Rica, Chile and Venezuela.In this countries, it is argued that the position of the presidency is always challenged. electric chairs to obey in Latin American democracies must mobilize popular sustenance non only from the people but also from opposite branches of government. As one of the writer concluded presidential rule is not a good deal equated with strong government. Effective executive power is almost indispensable if land is to thrive, yet the history of presidential democracies in Lati n America has a good deal been one of the immobilized executives.Many strong men ended their c beers as weak presidents (Mainwaring cited in Haque, 2001). In the Philippines alone, elected presidents have experienced difficulty in party legislation, without getting political support among members of sexual intercourse. So most often, elected presidents would always establish strong liaison or following from members of the legislative branch to the extent of supporting and financing the candidacy of potential legislative partners.Still yet, the President is the most important and influential leader of the country. The achievement of the state depends on how effective the President has become in manipulating other branches of government, albeit public criticisms and the intimidating presence of pressure or interest groups. distinguishable BRANCHES OF THE PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT The structure of the Philippine government is separate into third branches the Legislative plane sectio n (Article 6) the Executive Department (Article 7 )7) and the Judicial Department (Article 8).The Legislative Department was placed ahead of the executive department because it is the depository of the peoples sovereignty. It is composed of the Senate, which is the Upper House and Congress, being the lower berth House. THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS The powers of the government, by virtue of this principle are divided into three (3) distinct classes the legislative, the executive and the judicial. They are distributed, respectively among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches or departments of the government.Under the principle of co-equal and coordinate powers among the three (3) branches, the officers entrusted with each of these powers are not permitted to encroach upon the powers confided to the others. If one department goes beyond the limits set by the Constitution, its acts are null and void. The adoption of this principle was motivated by the belief that irresponsible rule would result if the same person or body were to mold all the powers of the government.PRINCIPLE OF CHECKS AND BALANCESThe three co-equal departments are established by the makeup in as balanced positions as possible. To maintain this balance or to restore it if upset, each department is given authorized powers with which to check the others. Checks by the President Checks by the Congress Checks by the Judiciary may cast out or disapprove bills enacted by the Congress (Sec. 271) through pardoning power, he may modify or set aside the judgments of courts (Art. VII, Sec 19) Congress may override the veto of the President (Sec. 271) Reject certain appointments of the President (Art. VII, Sec. 16)Revoke the proclamation of martial law or fracture of the writ of habeas corpus by the President (Art. VII, Section 18) Amend or revoke the decision of the Court by the enactment of a red-hot law or by an amendment of the old The power to impeach the President and the members of the Supreme Court. the Supreme Court as the final arbiter may declare legislative measures or executive acts unconstitutional (Art. VIII, Sec 42) determine whether or not there has been a grave abhorrence of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of the Congress or President (Art. VIII, Sec. 22)